For RevOps & deal desk · $100/month
Deals stall in contract land.
Bring them back.
Word-native redlining, AI review that cites the clause, and a record of every term you ever conceded, per customer. $100/mo, unlimited users, no seat math for sales.
One contract and a full AI review, free, no credit card. The free tier is the demo.
§ 1. Recitals (the part where we acknowledge reality)
Whereas, the job looks like this.
a.The signature gap is invisible in your funnel.
The rep gets a verbal yes. Then the contract sits in someone's inbox for a week and a half, and the CRM shows nothing, because tracking stops at closed-won. One RevOps analysis argues the contract phase has more handoffs per hour of work than any other stage in the revenue cycle: rep to deal desk to legal to procurement and back.
Source: Zignt, contract velocity metrics for RevOps ↗
See also: TermScout, contracts as the RevOps bottleneck ↗
b.Non-standard terms multiply, and nobody knows what was conceded last time.
Every deal with custom SLAs or payment terms becomes its own negotiation. When whoever reviews contracts can get through five a week and sales closes twelve, the queue is structural. It is not a people problem, and hiring a second reviewer doesn't change the ratio for long.
Source: Rework, pipeline bottleneck analysis ↗
See also: TermScout, standard templates and cycle time ↗
c.Sales efficiency is already falling. Contract drag makes it worse.
Fullcast's benchmarks report found win rates down 8.3% and sales cycles roughly 7% longer year over year. Another dashboard won't fix the demo-to-close stage. Fewer days sitting in redlines might.
Source: Fullcast, RevOps bottlenecks ↗
This is not a paperwork problem
World Commerce & Contracting's research puts value lost to poor contracting at roughly 9% of annual revenue on average, with the best performers near 3% and the worst at 15% or more. Their 2025 whitepaper also finds contract data scattered across about 24 systems in a typical organization, and nearly 90% of business users saying contracts are hard or impossible to understand.
§ 2. What version90 does about it
Now, therefore: the same product, pointed at your desk.
01
See every deal's paper in one queue
Every version of every order form and MSA, with a status that says whose turn it is. When the rep asks where the contract is, the answer is a link, not a search of three inboxes.
02
Know what you conceded to Acme before you concede it again
Pin your standard order form and MSA as baselines. Each counterparty draft comes back with deviations flagged clause by clause: Net 45 where you say Net 30, a cap that quietly moved, a termination right that wasn't there last round.
03
Upload closed-won, get a term database
Drop the executed contracts into the archive. Payment terms, auto-renewal, liability caps and renewal dates are extracted per customer and searchable, so the next renewal conversation starts from what was actually signed.
§ 3. Exhibit A
An order form and MSA bundle from a customer, benchmarked against your pinned standard. Payment terms moved, the deal desk already has a position on it, and the customer can't see the note.
Key terms
Order Form + MSA
- Customer
- Northwind Analytics, Inc.
- ACV
- $84,000
- Term
- 12 months, auto-renew
- Payment terms
- Net 45 · standard: Net 30
- Discount
- 12%
- Liability cap
- 12 months of fees
🔒 Internal note · Sam Okafor, deal desk
Discount approved. Hold Net 30.
Payment terms moved to Net 45 DEVIATION
“Customer shall pay all undisputed invoices within forty-five (45) days of receipt.” (Order Form §4.2)
Your pinned order form says Net 30. Northwind changed it in their last round. Precedent: Net 30 in 3 of 3 prior agreements with Northwind Analytics.
Restore Net 30 ✨ Explain implications
Net 45 is within the recorded position WITHIN POSITION
Deal desk recorded Net 45 as approved for this customer. The deviation is flagged, and so is the approval.
every finding cites the clause it came from · verified against the document
Flagged
Auto-renews 2026-10-01 with 30-day notice. Notice window closes 2026-09-01.
§ 4. Consideration
One plan. $100/mo.
That's the pricing page.
The incumbents charge tens of thousands a year and make you sit through a demo to find that out. We put our price in a heading. Roughly 95% of the capability at roughly 5% of the price. The missing 5% is mostly the procurement paperwork.
See the whole pricing page anyway →Questions from RevOps & deal desk
Does it connect to HubSpot or Salesforce?
Not yet. Every document exports byte-for-byte, and the REST API and MCP server are documented at developers.version90.com, so linking a CRM is a small integration rather than a migration. When a native integration ships, this answer changes first.
Can reps use it without seeing internal notes?
Internal notes are visible to everyone in your organization and never to the counterparty. That boundary is structural, not a setting. Roles are owner, admin and member, and admins can limit what members do, such as sending a draft to the counterparty. What roles don't do is hide internal notes from a teammate: inside your organization they are visible to all, outside it to no one.
What if we do 30 contracts a month?
The plan includes a monthly allowance of new contracts, with published top-up rates for the months you run past it, and nothing is charged without asking first. The exact allowances and rates are on the plan details page, and they are the same for every customer.
In witness whereof
Retire the _FINAL_v7 filename.
Start free with one contract and a full AI review, no credit card required. $100/month for every feature when you're ready. Your first contract can be under review in about ninety seconds.